• RSS Queering the Church

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Spirit of a Liberal

    • Gonna Stick My Sword in the Golden Sand September 15, 2014
      Gonna Stick My Sword in the Golden Sand: A Vietnam Soldier's Story has just been released. The title comes from a stanza of the gospel traditional, Down by the Riverside, with its refrain--"Ain't gonna study war no more." Golden Sand is a bold, dark, and intense retelling of the Vietnam experience through the eyes of an army scout that is […]
      Obie Holmen
    • Gay Games Symposium July 21, 2014
      I am pleased and honored that the UCC has asked me to moderate a symposium during the games entitled Queer Christians: Celebrating the Past, Shaping the Future. [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]
      Obie Holmen
  • RSS There Will be Bread

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS The Wild Reed

    • Photo of the Day April 17, 2018
      See also the previous Wild Reed posts:• Spring's Snowy Start• Farewell Winter• Out and About – Winter 2017-2018Image: Michael J. Bayly.
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
    • The Spring Blizzard of 2018 April 14, 2018
      It's being called a blizzard and a winter storm of "historic" proportions. I'm opting to acknowledge the season we're actually in (as hard as it may be to believe) and calling it the spring blizzard of 2018. . . . And, yes, it's still very much happening right now in the Twin Cities and across southern Minnesota.I was out in it […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
  • RSS Bilgrimage

  • RSS Enlightened Catholicism

  • RSS Far From Rome

    • the way ahead March 23, 2013
      My current blog is called the way ahead.
      noreply@blogger.com (PrickliestPear)
  • RSS The Gay Mystic

    • Mystical Czech artist, Marie Brozova February 22, 2018
      About Life, Universe and All…The luminous Czech artist, Marie Brozova, creator of the wonderful 'Forest Shaman' painting featured on my blog, lives with her husband and seven cats deep in a Czech forest - without electricity or running water. No computers, no cell phones, no TV. Only the silence and the sounds of nature and the spirits. Artist Mari […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Richard Demma)
    • SPICING UP THE CHURCH: February 14, 2018
      Here is the website of the wonderful meeting group for gay Christians in the Czech republic, Logos. And below is their position statement. Check them out. Logos – Gay Christians in the Czech RepublicWe are an ecumenical fellowship of gay and lesbian Christians and their friends, in which we share our faith in all its diverse manifestations, and try to suppor […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Richard Demma)
  • RSS The Jesus Manifesto

    • Another World is Neccessary: Anarchism, Christianity and the Race from the White House July 30, 2008
      I’ll be presenting at the upcoming Jesus Radicals conference in Columbus, Ohio. My session (on the relationship between Church and State) will be on Friday afternoon. If you’re in the area, drop by. I’d love to meet some of the folks who frequent this site. Here’s the info: August 15-16, 2008 St. John’s Episcopal 1003 W Town Columbus, OH [...]ShareThis […]
      Mark Van Steenwyk
  • RSS John McNeill: Spiritual Transformations

  • RSS Perspective

    • Kittens go to the vet April 20, 2018
      Today my sister gave me a ride to the vet to take the two kittens. One had an eye that hasn't opened and the vet place had taken a step back from agreeing to adopt the kittens out. But things seem to be working out. The vet loved the kittens and said they would be very adoptable - they said they would take them in about a week or so. The kitten with the […]
      noreply@blogger.com (crystal)
  • Advertisements

Is being ‘unorthodox’ sinful or could it be the way forward?

For the past few weeks I’ve been engrossed in reading a find that I fortuitously happened upon at my school’s library – Reading Judas: The Gospel of Judas and the Shaping of Christianityby Elaine Pagels and Karen L. King. As I’ve explored and contemplated on its subject matter I’ve realized that the Gospel of Judas was not only a subversive and compelling narrative at the time of its composition but also has much wisdom to impart to Christians of the twenty-first century.

Today, the Gospel of Judas can be grouped into a category of early Christians works that have come to be referred to as “Gnostic.” In Greek “gnosis” translates as knowledge, and the various Christian communities who would now be classified as Gnostic saw salvation as being accomplished through delving into one’s soul and becoming enlightened spiritually. Gnostic Christians continued to view Jesus of Nazareth as the prime revelator of what the Reign of God in this world would be like. Yet, instead of believing in a physical resurrection of the body after death, Gnostics were convicted that the corporal body would deteriorate while the soul would remain alive forever with God.

In the Gospel of Judas (which was authored during the mid-second century C.E.) a theological agenda is presented rather than a historical analysis of the man Judas Iscariot. Although it would never make it into the canonical New Testament, it shared in common with the four Gospels the fact that its author was probably not the apostle whose name the work bore but rather a particular person or community invoking that disciple’s memory and authority in order to give credence to their words.

Its plot centers around the conviction that instead of the twelve apostles – who Jesus is traditionally depicted as choosing and commissioning to spread the Gospel – it is Judas alone who genuinely comprehended the meaning behind the words and example that Christ left as a testimony to mankind. Throughout the narrative, Jesus is shown to mock, dismiss, and even laugh at the twelve apostles in comparison to the fidelity of his chosen protegé, Judas. At one point, “the twelve” (as they are referred to with ignorance and condescension throughout the work) come before Jesus and describe to Him a horrific nightmare which they all experienced. They detail to Him of how they all were beholders of a contingent of priests arrayed before an altar in sacrifice. Next, the apostles relay to Jesus how they witness the priests proceed to sacrifice their own wives and children upon this altar and continue to carry out other sinful acts of debauchery. The response of Jesus to their account is a chilling one, He flatly states:

You are the ones you saw receiving sacrifices at the altar…And the domestic animals you saw being brought for sacrifice are the multitude you are leading astray upon that altar.” -Judas 5:1,4

By the end of the Gospel, Jesus initiates His own demise by imploring Judas to hand Him over to be killed. Thus, the act that for a millenia has been depicted as the height of hypocrisy and betrayal is here painted as a final act of trust and discipleship. The ensuing passion account that makes up a key part of the four canonical Gospels is notably absent in the Gospel of Judas, nor is there a direct portrayal of the Resurrection of Jesus. This implies that the death of Jesus was the ultimate gateway that freed His Spirit from the prison of His body and allowed Him to return to God. Thus, in keeping with Gnostic theology, the Resurrection is a spiritual not a physical reality – Jesus passing from one stage of life, to the next.

The question begs to be answered: what do these intriguing themes and images mean?

It must be remembered that the time in which the Gospel of Judas was composed was an uncertain and tumultuous one for the early Church. During the second century C.E. the Roman empire carried out relentless persecutions against those who identified themselves as followers of Christ. Tragically, scores lost their lives for the sake of their devotion to the Good News. Many leaders of the Church, principally St. Irenaeus of Lyons, encouraged Christians to remain faithful to the end, indicating that God was pleased by the death of dedicated and brave individuals just as He was satisfied and desired the passion and death of Jesus upon the cross.

Modern scholarship now shows that this was not the only theological view that prevailed among Christians of the day. The Gospel of Judas is tangible proof of this fact. Instead of being of one “uniform faith” as the Catholic and Orthodox churches have maintained for centuries, the early Church was rather an intensely diverse and heterogenous organism. In fact, it could be said to more closely resemble how Christianity is expressed today – through numerous denominations and theological points of view – than with the monolithic, imperial institution it would later morph into during the Middle Ages. The Christian communities of the ancient world encompassed numerous and unique groups, usually, each with their own respective interpretation of the Gospel. Also, at this time there was no formalized canon that defined what Christians had to read, so the traditional four Gospels we know today that expound on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth were just four among numerous other reflections that attempted to put into words just what the life of this extraordinary man meant for the rest of humanity.

Whomever it was that authored the Gospel of Judas vehemently disagreed with the approach to the subject of martyrdom that St. Irenaeus and other leaders of the Church were taking – namely, that if the opportunity to offer one’s life for the sake of the Gospel was presented, they should take it, or risk eternal damnation. It made them ask the question: what kind of God would delight and desire in the death of those who loved Him? Moreover, a God that required the sacrifice of His own Son to placate His wrath and restore harmony to the universe seemed very much motivated by vengeance and hedonism rather than mercy and peace.

This violent approach to the exercise of one’s faith was blatantly evoked in the Gospel of Judas when the twelve apostles regaled the horrors of their dream to Jesus only to learn from His lips that it was themselves that they had witnessed committing such atrocious acts.

When the Gospel of Judas was written there was no universally defined ecclesiastical hierarchy as there is today in Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy and other Christian bodies. But the glimpses of such an establishment would begin to appear during the second half of the second century C.E. It was then that various leaders of the Church, who began to be styled as ‘bishops’, would invoke apostolic authority over whole jurisdictions and communities as ‘successors of the apostles’ claiming that Jesus had instituted the group of twelve apostles so that following His death and Resurrection, his Church on earth would always be guided and secured in the truth by the successors of His original first followers. Obviously, the authors of the Gospel of Judas held this opinion in grave contempt.

However, this theological trend would become the norm in the coming decades and in 325 C.E. Emperor Constantine would convene the Council of Nicaea (in modern day Turkey) to declare Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire. Yet, all the bishops that he invited to the Council were all leaders of wealthy and powerful churches throughout the Mediterranean. It was these bishops who would agree upon the terms laid out in what we know today as the Nicene Creed. Now that this was the officially endorsed version of the Christian faith that was to be practiced throughout the empire any other expressions of Christianity that deviated from the conditions enumerated in the Creed were condemned as “heresy” and nearly all of their churches, writings and communities were destroyed by those who were now in power who saw themselves as being the orthodox (adhering to ‘right belief’). In one of the most unjust and sad cases, it can be seen here that history is truly written by the victors.

It was only by chance that the Gospel of Judas was discovered, after countless centuries of dormancy, hidden in a jar, scrawled on fragmenting pieces of papyri in the sands of the Egyptian desert.

Now, a voice has been restored to a paradigm that history thought had been extinguished. Can Christians today, and all people of goodwill, continue to be edified and enlightened by the wisdom of its words?

The fundamental premise expressed in the Gospel of Judas has more poignancy today, than ever before.

Considering who won the theological dispute, the notion of sacrifice still has a profoundly central focal point throughout all of Christianity. The defiled, sinful nature of mankind is still used as the ultimate explanation to describe why Jesus of Nazareth was put to death on the cross. Now, within Catholicism – especially in the English-speaking world – with the advent of new, imposed translations of the Mass, it will be the sacrifice of Christ, above all else, that stands out as the overarching theme during the celebration of the Eucharist. It is not as if this theme should be relegated to the sidelines, as Christians throughout the centuries have seen the Eucharist as, mystically, uniting all the faithful to the final act of love that Christ performed through His death on the cross. But forgetting about the concept of the Eucharist as an intimate meal – as the Last Supper was – and a joyful act of worship that the entire Christian community participates in (not simply those who have been ordained) fails to live up to the legacy that the Second Vatican Council bequeathed to the entire universal Church.

Even today, it seems that the self-proclaimed ‘successors of the apostles’ continue to forcefully advocate for martyrdom among today’s Christians or risk being consigned to the realm of eternal hellfire. Instead of progressing and reflecting with society about the diversity and inherent worth of all humanity, many leaders of the Church continue to exhort lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons to sacrifice themselves on the altar of orthodoxy by stating equivocally that celibacy is the only path to holiness in this life they can hope to enjoy. Although not a physical act of martyrdom, it is indeed one of the mind, of the psyche, and ultimately of the soul.

Again, the Church must ask itself, “What kind of God is this?”

It may have been fate that allowed the Gospel of Judas to be discovered for the edification of the whole People of God throughout the world. Perhaps a persona that for centuries has represented betrayal, deceit, and hatred can be rehabilitated to offer the human race what Jesus of Nazareth originally intended to impress upon all those whom He met? “I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly (John 10:10).


8 Responses

  1. Phillip, thank you for this thought-provoking commentary. The most important point I take from it is that the alternative voice is often as important, or even more important, than the one that gets designated as “official.” And when we’re talking about a catholic church, there has to be a place for every voice.

    The process by which what we call orthodoxy got established in the early church, and by which the structures of the church were set in place, was intensely political–as political as theological. To a great extent, orthodoxy simply became the name of the winning side. It takes a great deal of faith, for me, to see the hand of the Holy Spirit in some of the events and actions that established the winning side in the early church, too.

    On another point: if you want to read a wonderful life of Jesus from a non-Western (but Catholic) perspective, which takes seriously the idea that Judas was the one among Jesus’s disciples who most completely understood him and his desire to give himself up completely rather than dominate others, you may find Shusaku Endo’s life of Jesus of great interest.

  2. Phillip,

    Interesting article. But, shouldn’t your question really be, “Is being Gnostic a way forward?”. I don’t see any connection with orthodoxy and sinfulness.

    It strikes me that many of today’s Western/Occidental people may be much better suited to understanding Christianity through a Gnostic perspective, than a more traditional perspective.

    For example, I know a former seminarian who follows the teachings of Jesus, but considers himself an atheist. Obviously, the more traditional method did not suit him. While the more unorthodox ways of thinking suit him well, I don’t see much practical difference in his beliefs and most theists beliefs.

    • I think that anyone who truly lives by the values espoused by Jesus of Nazareth – namely, the seeking of justice, and the radical love of God and neighbor – can consider themselves a follower of Christ.

      Rigid dogmatism that has been concocted by men may be what some have a difficult time swallowing. And when you analyze almost nearly every doctrine of the Church, you can see that in some way or another it was agreed upon through the contemplations and discussions of the male religious leaders of the Church – in a somewhat limited context.

      The point of my posting was, why can’t there be more than one way to be a Christian? During the time that the Gospel of Judas was written there existed – simultaneously – not one, uniform expression of faith in Christ, but many diverse and plentiful charisms. This was all before a canon had been imposed by any council, or a solitary Creed defined what all Christians ‘must’ believe.

      Yet, even though there wasn’t a single standard, the early Church seemed to flourish in its diversity and multiplicity – when it came to interpreting the teachings of Christ and how God was communicated through His life, death and Resurrection.

      If this was good enough for the early Church before councils and creeds, why can’t this attitude be restored? As I mentioned, in a way of speaking – such an attitude exists within the Body of Christ today with the existence of multiple denominations. But my question is, even within a single denomination, why can’t there be multiple means of expressing faith in Christ instead of just one, that’s been imposed from above?

    • Phillip,

      The idea that there is only one faith imposed from above strikes me as a fiction. The Church is clear that Jesus Christ, not the Church officials is the source of the faith. Even in matters in which the Church has spoken, the Church is clear that individual conscience is the final arbiter of faith.

      Not only are there multiple ways of expressing the faith, but Church teaching invites bishops to develop their own catechisms so long as those catechisms are not in direct conflict with the teachings of the broader Church.

      While I agree that most dogmas of the Church were developed within a limited context, Gnostics theologies seemed to have developed without any context. These theologies seemed to have lost their favor because they were not communal. With today’s movement to more pluralistic theologies, I suspect that Gnosticism will become increasingly popular. I would argue that both the evangelical movement and the humanistic movements within the Church are an expression of genuine attempts to live the faith outside of the boundaries of the Catholic Church’s teaching.

  3. So last time I stopped by you were rejecting the teaching of Vatican II about the constitution of the Church. Now you’re promoting gnosticism. I suppose it’s a natural progression.

    The ironic thing about the Gospel of Judas is how relatively prominently it is scandalized by men who sleep with men. Does Professor Pagels address that?

    • She did actually, and explained how it’s all relative to its culture 🙂

      • Since homosexuality was anethema in Jewish culture it was a device used by the author of the Gospel of Judas to paint the twelve apostles – and thus, those who were espousing a hiearchical model of the Church and evoking ‘apostolic succession’ as being morally debased – particularly by their suggestions that God desired and was pleased by the death of Jesus upon the cross and the subsequent martyrdom of other Christians.

  4. I sometimes wonder if there had been better and faster communication between the various churches that were established by the original disciples if we would now have a vastly different Church. Gnosticism did sort of percolate in a kind of vacuum, just as the Indian church purported to have been founded by St Thomas also has it’s unique interpretation of the Gospel.

    What I find as interesting as the differences, are the more frequent similarities in the message. In it’s core, the Gospel teachings of Jesus are not culturally limited. It’s the interpretations placed on them that make them culturally limited.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: