• RSS Queering the Church

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Spirit of a Liberal

    • To my Republican Friends July 6, 2020
      You voted for Trump even though you didn't like him. Doubted his character. Questioned his fitness for the job. Yet, your aversion to Hillary was even greater The post To my Republican Friends first appeared on Spirit of a Liberal.
      Obie Holmen
    • Wormwood and Gall a Midwest Book Award Finalist May 4, 2020
      The Midwest Independent Publishers Association (MIPA) recently named Wormwood and Gall as one of three finalists for a Midwest Book Award in the Religion/Philosophy category. The awards program, which is organized by MIPA, recognizes quality in independent publishing in the Midwest. The post Wormwood and Gall a Midwest Book Award Finalist first appeared on S […]
      Obie Holmen
  • RSS There Will be Bread

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS The Wild Reed

    • Mooloolaba March 22, 2023
      Australian Sojourn – March 2023 • Part 5I’m currently in Australia where I recently visited friends in Maclean, New South Wales and Mooloolaba on Queensland's Sunshine Coast. It was a wonderful time of reconnection and celebration.Specifically, I reconnected with members of the McGowan family, whom I’ve knowns since my teaching days in Goulburn, and cel […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
    • Andrew Harvey on Our “Divine Identity” March 22, 2023
      – Lloyd KwillaOne of the books I’m reading during my current Australian sojourn is Andrew Harvey and Mark Matousek’s Dialogues With a Modern Mystic.Following is an excerpt that particularly spoke to me. It’s accompanied by Indigenous Australian artwork. According to Andrew Harvey, such artwork reflects people and cultures aware of and living from their “divi […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
  • RSS Bilgrimage

  • RSS Enlightened Catholicism

  • RSS Far From Rome

    • the way ahead March 23, 2013
      My current blog is called the way ahead.
      noreply@blogger.com (PrickliestPear)
  • RSS The Gay Mystic

    • A saint for the millenials: Carlo Acutis beatified today in Assisi. October 10, 2020
       A saint for the millenials: the young Italian teen, Carlo Acutis, who died in 2006 of galloping Leukemia, will be beatified today in Assisi by Pope Francis (last step before being officially declared a saint). Carlo came from a luke warm Catholic family, but at the age of 7, when he received his first 'Holy Communion', he displayed an astonishing […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)
    • Ronan Park and Jack Vidgen: The Travails of Gay Pop Stars October 28, 2019
      (Jack Vidgen)Quite by accident, through a comment from a performance arts colleague of mine, I stumbled across the recent bios of two boy teen singing sensations, both of whom made a big splash worldwide 8 years ago. The first, Jack Vidgen, won Australia's Got Talent Contest in 2011 at the age of 14, primarily for his powerful renditions of Whitney Hust […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)
  • RSS The Jesus Manifesto

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS John McNeill: Spiritual Transformations

  • RSS Perspective

    • Waco March 26, 2023
      Trump held his first campaign rally today at Waco, Texas ... Waco was the perfect venue for Trump, and his rally was what you would expect from someone channeling cult leader David Koresh: full of lies, rants against the government, apocalyptic threats, etc etc etc. Trump describes 2024 election as ‘the final battle’ from podium in WacoTrump's fans at t […]
      noreply@blogger.com (crystal)

Robert McClory on Danger of Turning Metaphor Into Law

I’ve long contended that one of the most pernicious confusions that religious believers with a fundamentalist bent introduce into public discourse about religious issues is this: they take what is metaphorical, and they try to freeze the metaphor.  To absolutize it.  To make the analogical into a litmus test of absolute truth rather than a metaphor pointing in imperfect, halting human language to what transcends language.

And pointing to what requires many different analogies or metaphors to represent its rich diversity, since the richly diverse spiritual realm is by its very nature beyond human language.  One of the most glaring cases in point is this: those who argue that God is male, that the application of gendered language to God is not analogical but a precise description of who God is in “his” very nature, have absolutized what is clearly meant to be metaphorical in the scriptures of the world religions.  They have frozen a metaphor, lost sight of its metaphorical significance, and they then frequently want to impose the frozen, absolutized metaphor on both their own religious traditions and society at large as a litmus test of orthodoxy.

The Jewish and Christian scriptures employ both male and female analogies to speak of a God who is beyond gender, beyond human language, more wildly and richly diverse than any single metaphor can ever capture.  The very first image of God we encounter in the Judaeo-Christian bible is that of God as a mother bird hovering over the still-to-be-tamed chaos, to bring it to birth as a mother bird does her clutch of eggs.  God broods over the unformed void to bring it into being.

And Jesus echoes this image of God the mother enfolding her brood under her wings when he laments that Jerusalem has resisted his embrace, which is akin to that of a hen trying to hold her chicks close to her to protect them.  No single metaphor for God (or for any religious phenomenon) fully captures the divine.  We need many different metaphors in order to begin to approach the rich complexity of the spiritual realm.

And because this seems so self-evident to me, I find Robert McClory’s recent critique of statements of the former head of the U.S. Catholic bishops, Francis George, refreshing.  McClory entitles his critique “Turning Metaphors Into Laws.”  As he notes, George (and other U.S. bishops) have been working fast and furious to absolutize gender-based Catholic metaphors to explain to us precisely why we ought to find gay marriage impossible or why women can’t possibly preside at the eucharistic liturgy.  McClory notes that in a recent article in the Catholic New World, Cardinal George “juggled both issues at once using the image of Christ as bridegroom and the church as bride.”

Women are wonderful, George argues, but they just can’t do what a priest is all about, which is representing Christ as the bridegroom of the church.  We need a man standing at the altar so that we don’t get confused about who we are as church–the virginal bride of Christ–with a male priest at our head representing the bridegroom in our virginal ecclesial transaction with Christ the eternal bridegroom.

Well, something like that.  I confess that, when the metaphors start flying quick and thick in these theological-political discussions, and when they become so treacly and mind-numbing that I can follow them only by shutting down the critical portions of my God-given brain in order to make any sense of them, I begin to tune out.  Because I believe, as McClory aptly puts it, that

[m]etaphors are meant to help us meditate on mysteries beyond our full comprehension. They have limits and do not serve their intended purpose when forced into the role of barriers against the work of the Spirit in the church.

And to piggyback on the preceding concluding statement of McClory’s article: one of the strangest and most destructive legacies John Paul II bequeathed the church of our period of history is his magical-mystical theology of the body, which wheels through one gendered metaphor after another, all focused on demonstrating that God made men to be men and women to be women, and the order of the cosmos depends on keeping both in their place.  On keeping women subjugated to men, that is.

As this magical-mystical theology has inflamed the imaginations of Catholics without a scintilla of appreciation for its metaphorical basis (and its metaphorical limitations), and as those Catholics inflamed by the theology of the body have frozen its magical-mystical metaphors into gospel truth, what the Catholic church has to say about human sexuality and issues of gender has gotten sillier and sillier.

Until few folks with good sense are willing to listen to what we have to say about these matters any longer.  Nor should they.

Cross-posted from Bilgrimage, 8 July 2011.


2 Responses

  1. While I Certainly agree with McClory’s analysis I find that the existence of women priestesses in so many of the cultures Christianity first evangelized is a question which needs to be faced. If the metaphor derived from the Hebrew Scriptures and Jesus’ own words are to receive proper emphasis why were the non-Jewish experiences not used in developing Church structures? Women priests would have a fit in many areas outside of Israel and the Church’s First evangelizers. Rome had the Vestal Virgins; Greece had the Delphic Oracle; a multitude of groups used female officiants. Why did Christianity refuse to accept this culturally acceptable form in its Hierarchy?

  2. “Why did Christianity refuse to accept this culturally acceptable form in its Hierarchy?”

    Did it, though, Jack? There’s first of all the case of Phebe, who is identified in Romans 16:1-2 as a diakonos–a deacon. Translators have long sought to disguise this use of the official ministerial title for Phebe either by feminizing the term and turning her into a “deaconness,” or by rendering the term as “servant,” when they use the official term “deacon” anytime the term is applied to a male.

    There’s a large body of evidence that women did, in fact, preside at the Eucharist in early Christianity and hold other official ministerial positions in the Christian community. As the church became ever more misogynistic and male dominated, that body of evidence began to be suppressed.

    There’s another scriptural bit of evidence that also seems highly significant to me. Many scripture scholars argue (and I’m persuaded by them) that Jesus and the early church were highly critical of the notion of any form of cultic priesthood. The early church wouldn’t have adopted either female-oriented or male-oriented forms of cultic priesthood, if this exegesis is correct, since it saw Christian ministry according to a whole new model of service and not of cultic worship.

    That’s not to say that the cultic understanding didn’t begin to dominate later in Christian history. It’s to say, though, that it’s not the predominant understanding of Christian ministry in the New Testament–the New Testament, which has to norm and critique all embodiments and understandings of church, since it’s our revelatory basis.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: