• RSS Queering the Church

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Spirit of a Liberal

    • Gonna Stick My Sword in the Golden Sand September 15, 2014
      Gonna Stick My Sword in the Golden Sand: A Vietnam Soldier's Story has just been released. The title comes from a stanza of the gospel traditional, Down by the Riverside, with its refrain--"Ain't gonna study war no more." Golden Sand is a bold, dark, and intense retelling of the Vietnam experience through the eyes of an army scout that is […]
      Obie Holmen
    • Gay Games Symposium July 21, 2014
      I am pleased and honored that the UCC has asked me to moderate a symposium during the games entitled Queer Christians: Celebrating the Past, Shaping the Future. [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]
      Obie Holmen
  • RSS There Will be Bread

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS The Wild Reed

    • Return to Guruk July 24, 2017
      . . . a.k.a Port MacquarieI've spent the last week-and-a-half in the Australian coastal town of Port Macquarie, which since 2002 has been home to my parents, Gordon and Margaret Bayly (pictured with me above last Thursday, July 20).I was happy to see that on the local council's new-look signage for the town the aboriginal word for the area – Guruk […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
    • Photo of the Day July 23, 2017
      NEXT: Return to GurukImage: Michael J. Bayly (Flynns Beach, Port Macquarie).
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
  • RSS Bilgrimage

  • RSS Enlightened Catholicism

  • RSS Far From Rome

    • the way ahead March 23, 2013
      My current blog is called the way ahead.
      noreply@blogger.com (PrickliestPear)
  • RSS The Gay Mystic

    • Christmas at Litmanova December 29, 2016
      The Marian Shrine of Litmanova, Slovakia.Christmas 2017A forest chapel at the Slovakian Marian shrine of Litmanova.Stunning painting of the Sacred Heart inside the forest chapel.
      noreply@blogger.com (Richard Demma)
    • Not Our President November 16, 2016
      To hear the simplistic denial of those who scream out with naiveté “give Trump a chance” as they condemn others engaged in selfless protest against a certain political and social tsunami in the making, is to ignore his life-time public embrace of policies that tens of millions reject as not just destructive, but evil per se. They are not mistaken.Those in st […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Richard Demma)
  • RSS The Jesus Manifesto

    • Another World is Neccessary: Anarchism, Christianity and the Race from the White House July 30, 2008
      I’ll be presenting at the upcoming Jesus Radicals conference in Columbus, Ohio. My session (on the relationship between Church and State) will be on Friday afternoon. If you’re in the area, drop by. I’d love to meet some of the folks who frequent this site. Here’s the info: August 15-16, 2008 St. John’s Episcopal 1003 W Town Columbus, OH [...]ShareThis […]
      Mark Van Steenwyk
  • RSS John McNeill: Spiritual Transformations

  • RSS Perspective

    • It's good to be king July 22, 2017
      Trump has decided he has the power to pardon all his minions and all his family members, not to mention the power to pardon himself. Wow - even Richard Nixon didn't try this, apparently because he found the idea "dishonorable".This "pardon oneself" idea comes after last week's news about Sean Spicer quitting in protest, after Je […]
      noreply@blogger.com (crystal)

German Official Releases Damning Report about Handling of Abuse Cases in Munich Diocese

As a complement and follow-up to Terry Weldon’s earlier (and excellent) posting about this topic today, which breaks the important story of the report filed in Germany yesterday by former Judge Marion Westphal about the abuse situation in the Munich-Freising archdiocese, I’d like to add a brief summary of the highlights of the Westphal report.  The following is from a posting earlier today at my Bilgrimage site:

There seems to be a story emerging in the German media today, about which I’m reading through links provided on the Bishop Accountability website.  The story has to do with a report released yesterday by Marion Westphal, a former judge who was commissioned by the archdiocese of Munich and Freising to compile a report on the abuse situation from 1945-2000 in the Munich archdiocese, using files made available by the archdiocese.  An English-language summary of the report is here.  An English-language discussion of the report is at the Local.de site, which summarizes German media reports in English.  For those who can read German, the Bishop Accountability site has linked to German media reports in Spiegel and Stern.

As the report notes, while the German legal system is concerned to pursue the facts relating to abuse cases involving churches in Germany, Westphal had a specific charge from the Munich-Freising archdiocese to do something that goes beyond fact-finding: the charge was to examine any “structural deficiencies” in the records maintained by the church that would impede fact-finding and account for failure to detect clerical abuse of minors and deal with it adequately.

And in this area of record-keeping, Westphal reports a “regrettable state.”  There are indicators, she concludes, of a much higher figure than the 159 cases of abuse that are obvious in the records made available to her.  But the state of the records–including evidence that “destruction of documents took place in considerable measure”–makes it very difficult to ascertain the precise number of priests against whom credible allegations of abuse were made.  Or how those cases (and quite a few of the 159 cases about which there are some records) were handled.  Or what final decisions were made vis-a-vis these priests.

Westphal also reports that documents were, in some cases, stored in private dwellings out of the chancery or episcopal palace, and “thus made susceptible to manipulation.”  (If anyone with knowledge of Catholic canon law is reading this posting: am I correct to think that canon law forbids storing such diocesan records off-site?)  Even on-site, the documents were, Westphal notes, not secured.

And so,

For these reasons, there were in many cases obvious gaps in the documentation. It was repeatedly impossible to reconstruct events. Vital documentation, affecting for example former activities of the person under  investigation or the reasons for a change of diocese in the case of incardinated priests, was missing in most cases.

Westphal also notes that the files often employ “euphemistic, trivialising language” that disguises what is actually being talked about and makes it difficult to ascertain precisely what the offenses of a particular cleric were.

She notes, as well, that the reaction of the bishops appear largely to have been to ignore the victims–to ignore what was done to them physically, as well as the long-term psychological consequences of the abuse they endured as children from religious authority figures.  The “serious lack of detection” of clerical abuse of minors by Catholic pastoral officials was, she suggests, directly related to “a completely underdeveloped interest in the facts of the cases,” and the unwillingness to investigate and deal with abusive priests was “the result of this disinterest in the fate of the victims and the reluctance to face the conflicts involved.”

There was, in fact, an habitual crass “contempt” on the part of church officials for victims of abuse, she concludes, with an overwhelming concern for safeguarding the image of the church above all.  And, as she notes, “These points are all the more serious because far-reaching sanctions, even such as threaten economic existence, are put in place against lay people, even for slight offences.”  (In other words, a lay person can easily lose his or her job in a Catholic institution–with dire economic consequences–simply for coming out of the closet as gay.  But a priest who abuses minors repeatedly will be shielded by the institution, and will experience no economic or social distress.)

In short, a “brotherly community” (i.e., a clerical club) sought to hush up cases of clerical abuse, even to the extent of manipulating and destroying evidence that might be used in legal investigations of cases of abuse of minors.  And in the case of priests who are gay, these problems have been compounded by the possibility of blackmail, due to the church’s teaching on homosexuality.

Westphal’s conclusion is absolutely chilling:

 

Instead of following its own mission and abiding by its moral precepts by stemming itself against attitudes that assign victims – and in particular victims of sexual offences – a joint responsibility, and place sexual topics under taboo, the Church has used this long-standing, prevalent social context to promote non-detection of misconduct.

To the same extent, it has not stood up for the rights of the children entrusted to it, and thus shares the responsibility for the fact that the victimised children, through the attitude adopted towards them, have often been exposed to the stress of childhood isolation in addition to that of the offence itself.

 

A damning report by a legal authority on the damnable behavior of Catholic pastoral leaders.  Catholic pastoral leaders who, in this case, include the current pope, who was archbishop of the diocese under review here from 1977-1982.

“Instead of following its own mission and abiding by its moral precepts” and standing up “for the rights of the children entrusted to it,” the clerical sector of the Catholic church has closed ranks, acted as though it alone is the church, and as if its own well-being and image counts above even the physical and mental well-being of children sexually abused by priests.

Is it any wonder that an increasing number of people cannot hear what the church preaches about mercy, compassion, and justice with anything but jaded ears?  And that so many of us have chosen to walk away, in sadness?

Advertisements

4 Responses

  1. It goes on and on, doesn’t it? And when we speak, we’re the ones who get labeled as disloyal Catholics.

  2. Yes, it’s like a bottomless pit, isn’t it, Frank?

    And you’re so right: we are supposedly the disloyal Catholics–when we express horror, along with Marion Westphal, that our pastoral officials have violated the basic moral principles that they teach and have failed to care for the children entrusted to them.

    Putting their own well-being and image (and assets) ahead of moral principles and human worth, it seems.

  3. Bill, thanks for following up on this. When I saw the story this morning, I was on the point of going up to London, for a Day of Recollection with the Soho Masses special ministers. I saw the news reports, and recognized their importance, but had no time to read or digest them in full, let alone provide sensible commentary – so I’m pleased you’ve done that.

    I’m struck by the obvious parallels with the US and Ireland – abuse, cover-ups, and total lack of concern for the victims.

    There was a little noted observation months ago, after the reports from Europe had emerged and then faded from the news cycle, that this story was by no means over: that once the various church and secular investigations appointed in the immediate wake of the original reports had published their findings, the resulting scandals would greatly overshadow anything seen previously. This may just be the start.

    And, significantly, it includes Ratzinger’s own diocese.Who conveniently destroyed the evidence against him?

  4. Terry, I’m glad you broke this story on Open Tabernacle. It definitely deserves a careful hearing.

    You’re right, it’s clear that the story of what went on in this diocese is far from over. I wonder if the diocese brought in Marion Westphal to do her audit because the legal consequences can be dire, if the government intervenes. Hence the attempt to find records explaining why the authorities didn’t act–seemingly for a long period of time, and consistently.

    Her report is damning: evidence in the files she read of many more cases than have been made available to her; evidence of information that is missing from those files, and other files now gone, to which pieces of evidence in existing files point; the evidence that some files were stored out of the chancery or episcopal palace (and I believe that contravenes canon law); unsecured files on site; files with incomplete information about how the pastoral officials handled abuse cases and decisions they made in these cases.

    It goes on and on. And, yes, the question now arises: who destroyed evidence of the handling of these cases by Archbishop Ratzinger?

    This is very serious.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: