• RSS Queering the Church

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Spirit of a Liberal

    • Gonna Stick My Sword in the Golden Sand September 15, 2014
      Gonna Stick My Sword in the Golden Sand: A Vietnam Soldier's Story has just been released. The title comes from a stanza of the gospel traditional, Down by the Riverside, with its refrain--"Ain't gonna study war no more." Golden Sand is a bold, dark, and intense retelling of the Vietnam experience through the eyes of an army scout that is […]
      Obie Holmen
    • Gay Games Symposium July 21, 2014
      I am pleased and honored that the UCC has asked me to moderate a symposium during the games entitled Queer Christians: Celebrating the Past, Shaping the Future. [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]
      Obie Holmen
  • RSS There Will be Bread

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS The Wild Reed

    • Quote of the Day March 27, 2017
      .The Trump kleptocrats are political arsonists. They are carting cans of gasoline into government agencies and Congress to burn down any structure or program that promotes the common good and impedes corporate profit.They ineptly have set themselves on fire over Obamacare, but this misstep will do little to halt the drive to, as Stephen Bannon promises, carr […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
    • Not Whether We Dance, But How March 24, 2017
      The Wild Reed's series on dance continues with a second excerpt from dancer, philosopher, and scholar of religion Kimerer LaMothe's fascinating book, Why We Dance: A Philosophy of Bodily Becoming. (To read the first excerpt, click here.)Oh, and it's probably helpful to know that for LaMothe, dancing is any bodily movement in which humans […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Michael J. Bayly)
  • RSS Bilgrimage

  • RSS Enlightened Catholicism

  • RSS Far From Rome

    • the way ahead March 23, 2013
      My current blog is called the way ahead.
      noreply@blogger.com (PrickliestPear)
  • RSS The Gay Mystic

    • Christmas at Litmanova December 29, 2016
      The Marian Shrine of Litmanova, Slovakia.Christmas 2017A forest chapel at the Slovakian Marian shrine of Litmanova.Stunning painting of the Sacred Heart inside the forest chapel.
      noreply@blogger.com (Richard Demma)
    • Not Our President November 16, 2016
      To hear the simplistic denial of those who scream out with naiveté “give Trump a chance” as they condemn others engaged in selfless protest against a certain political and social tsunami in the making, is to ignore his life-time public embrace of policies that tens of millions reject as not just destructive, but evil per se. They are not mistaken.Those in st […]
      noreply@blogger.com (Richard Demma)
  • RSS The Jesus Manifesto

    • Another World is Neccessary: Anarchism, Christianity and the Race from the White House July 30, 2008
      I’ll be presenting at the upcoming Jesus Radicals conference in Columbus, Ohio. My session (on the relationship between Church and State) will be on Friday afternoon. If you’re in the area, drop by. I’d love to meet some of the folks who frequent this site. Here’s the info: August 15-16, 2008 St. John’s Episcopal 1003 W Town Columbus, OH [...]ShareThis […]
      Mark Van Steenwyk
  • RSS John McNeill: Spiritual Transformations

  • RSS Perspective

    • New Horizons March 30, 2017
      The Moody Blues song I'm listening to now is the 1972 New Horizons, written and sung by Justin Hayward ....Well I've had dreams enough for oneAnd I've got love enough for threeI have my hopes to comfort meI got my new horizons out to seaBut I'm never gonna lose your precious giftIt will always be that way'cause I know I'm gonna […]
      noreply@blogger.com (crystal)

What is the Vatican REALLY Like?

Of course the people who can answer that question won’t. However, in their suit against the Holy See five US state insurance commissioners have given us an extraordinary glimpse through a peephole of how the Vatican operates. If you’re like me, it will literally take your breath away that two lawyers, three priests, two monsignors, one bishop, one archbishop and four cardinals – in fact every single Vatican employee or person with close ties to the Vatican – were willing to launder a convicted swindler’s money without hesitation or moral quandery thereby giving the impression that this was just business as usual.

Before reading directly from the actual case as presented in court, some background is needed to understand the transactions.

Insurance is regulated by the states. Insurance companies are required by statute to keep reserves for the purpose of paying anticipated claims. These reserves are in assets that are cash or can easily be converted to cash. Martin Frankel’s scheme was to purchase small life insurance companies which mostly sold funeral policies to the poor and siphon off the reserves into his own bank account. The annual reports continued to show adequate, but falsified, quantities of reserves. He chose small companies in small states where he thought the number of insurance department employees too few to verify his information. Purchasers of insurance companies are required to complete forms attesting to the backgrounds of the principals and their financial strength. Since Frankel had been barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from dealing in securities due to prior illegal operations, Frankel needed a “front” to purchase the companies. From 1990 until 1998, he was able to get by with a bogus business name and using the names of others as corporate officers, but when he wanted to purchase companies with larger reserves, he needed to show greater financial backing. He chose the Catholic Church as his front. Through a phony charitable foundation guaranteed to hold an account at the Vatican Bank, Frankel moved on to larger deals. Eventually, the Mississippi insurance commissioner, George Dale, caught on to his scheme. Frankel was caught after fleeing to Germany in 1999, was prosecuted and sent to prison. The insurance commissioners of four other states in addition to Mississippi – Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Arkansas – brought suit against the Vatican as conspiring with, and aiding and abetting Frankel. The money Frankel had looted from the companies domiciled in their states amounted to $200,000. The commissioners brought suit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act which trebled the damages to $600,000.

The names in the “Factual Allegations” should be self-explanatory except for Collins and Corbally who were associates of Frankel. Colagiovanni and MEF were explained in the lawsuit as follows:

“Monsignor Colagiovanni was a judge emeritus of the Tribunale della Rota Romana (the Rota), one of the Vaticans three appellate courts, and a professor in the Studio Rotale, a graduate program connected to the Rota. He was a consultant to two of the Vaticans Congregations: the Congregation for Divine Worship and Sacrament, and the Congregation for the Clergy. At all relevant times, Colagiovanni was a senior member of the “Curia,” the Vaticans government, and was an agent of the Vatican, exercising both actual and apparent authority on behalf of his principal, the Vatican. Colagiovannis status as a member of the Curia was integral to the workings of Frankels scheme.”“MEF is an autonomous pious foundation originally established in the Archdiocese of Naples, Italy. It was at all relevant times headquartered in and operated from the Vatican. An “autonomous pious foundation is an ecclesiastical entity, formed under the internal laws of the Roman Catholic Church known as Canon Law.” MEF publishes a journal, Monitor Ecclesiasticus, which reports the decisions of the Vaticans three tribunals and publishes articles relating to those decisions. The journal is distributed in nearly every country of the world, including the United States. In addition to publishing

Monitor Ecclesiasticus, MEF engages in general charitable works. At all relevant times, Colagiovanni was the President and legal representative of MEF, and was a member of the board of editors of Monitor Ecclesiasticus. At all relevant times, Father Peter Jacobs was the International Coordinator of MEF and helped with its fund-raising activities.”   

Here are direct quotes from the complaint filed in Fifth District Court, No. 3:01 CV 663BN, in 2002. I have made one change for editorial clarity. Sometimes the commissioners referred to Frankel by his alias “Rosse”. The lawsuit, however, states that the persons involved knew Frankel’s true identity and – whether the name was Frankel, Rosse or Kadiddlehopper – these Catholics knew they were laundering money and that money is laundered for illegal/immoral purposes.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/9525191/states-v-vatican

“In late July 1998, Frankel decided that the Roman Catholic Church would make an even better frontthan Collins for his purchase of United States insurance companies….Corbally introduced Frankel to Thomas A. Bolan (Bolan), a well-connected New York lawyer with ties to the Roman Catholic Church. Corbally told Bolan he knew a man who made millions a day through trading who wanted to help the poor and thought he should do it through the Roman Catholic Church.

Bolan contacted Father Peter Jacobs (Jacobs), a Roman Catholic priest with ties to the Vatican. Jacobs is officially incardinated in the Archdiocese of Washington, D.C., but lives in Rome.

Jacobs in turn contacted Defendant Colagiovanni. In the early part of August 1998, Jacobs and Colagiovanni flew to the United States at Frankels expense and met with Bolan and Frankel at Frankels home in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Frankel told Bolan, Jacobs and Colagiovanni he planned to set up a charitable foundation. This foundation would be formed in the Vatican, under Vatican law. Frankel proposed to secretly control the foundation through the ability to elect a majority of its Board of Trustees. Frankel offered to transfer $55 million to this Vatican foundation. The Vatican would be permitted to keep $5 million to do with as it saw fit, in exchange for which Frankel would be allowed to secretly retain control over the remaining $50 million, ostensibly to use for insurance company acquisitions. While at Frankels home in Greenwich, Bolan, Jacobs and Colagiovanni discussed how the $5 million that was to be donated for charitable purposes might be spent.

For Frankels plan to work, the $50 million had to appear to be Vatican money, being used to pursue a Vatican-related initiative. As Frankel explained in a letter addressed to Bolan: “Our agreement will include the Vaticans promise that the Vatican will aid me in my effort to acquire insurance companies by allowing Father Jacobs or another Vatican official to certify to the authorities, if necessary, that the source of funds for the Foundation is the Vatican.” In fact, Frankel  repeatedly stressed that his name should not be disclosed in any documents, and that no outsider should know he was the true source of the funds used in the deal.

Bolan then traveled to the Vatican and, with Colagiovanni, proposed the plan to Bishop Francesco Salerno (Salerno) in a meeting at the Vatican. At that time Salerno was the Secretary of the Prefecture for the Economic Affairs of the Holy See, the Vaticans finance department.” Salerno was also on the board of MEF. The parties discussed the proposal, informing Salerno specifically that Frankel would be the source of the funds, and would retain control of the $50 million, even after it was donatedto the Vatican foundation.

On August 18, 1998, Salerno approved the plan, saying it was a good idea,and instructed Bolan to prepare by-laws for the foundation. Bolan did so, and Jacobs provided them to Salerno. The proposed by-laws allowed Frankel to appoint two of the proposed foundations three trustees, and the Vatican to appoint the other. Salerno inquired of John Cardinal O’Connor, then the Archbishop of New York, as to who the Vatican appointee should be.

Thereafter, Jacobs received a telephone call from Salerno saying that the Vaticans Secretary of State had expressed misgivings about the plan. After consultation with Frankel, Bolan was again dispatched to the Vatican, where he and Jacobs met with Monsignor Gianfranco Piovano and Father Brian Farrell. Both were employees of the Vaticans Secretariat of State and met with Bolan and Jacobs in the Vatican building which houses the Secretariat. Piovano informed Bolan that Frankel could not control a Vatican foundation, and that the Vatican did not want the perception that it was running insurance companies.Piovano stated that some other way would have to be found to make the donation.

Frankel accepted Piovanos suggestion that they find some other wayby devising an alternative plan to accomplish the original goal of the scheme. Under the new plan, Frankel would form St. Francis of Assisi Foundation to Serve and Help the Poor and Alleviate Suffering (St. Francis). The new foundation would be created outside of the Vatican to alleviate the Vaticans concern about appearing to be involved in insurance company operations. A Vatican related charity would be the settlor of the new foundation. The Vatican-related charity would be able to state that it was funded by the Vatican, so that St. Francis could claim that its funding originated from Vatican sources. In actuality, however, St. Francis would be funded entirely from looted funds held in Frankels Swiss bank account.

Colagiovanni then agreed to allow MEF, the Vatican-related organization of which he was President, to be held out as the settlorof St. Francis. Colagiovanni spoke to Piovano and Salerno about MEF playing the role of the Vatican entity in Frankels plan. After speaking with them, Colagiovanni faxed a letter to Bolan, on Rota letterhead, informing him that MEF had been authorizedto receive the $55 million; that is, MEF would first receive and transfer the sum of $50 million to Frankels foundation, which would remain under Frankels control. MEF would then receive an additional $5 million from Frankel, to keep and use without restriction. Colagiovanni also confirmed to Bolan and Jacobs at a later meeting in Italy that the plan had been authorized.

MEF was used to create the impression that the funding for Frankels foundation, St. Francis, had come from the Vatican or Vatican-related sources. However, neither the Vatican nor MEF would provide any of their own funds to St. Francis. Instead, Colagiovanni was told that Frankel would deposit funds in an MEF account, which would in turn be transferred to an account in St. Francisname. Colagiovanni, acting as an agent for the Vatican, knew of and approved this plan. Bolan memorialized this plan in a writing which Colagiovanni signed.

Other Vatican personnel also knew of this plan. Upon information and belief, Colagiovanni consulted with sostituto Giovanni Battista Cardinal Re, head of the First Section of the Vatican Secretariat of State, before he agreed to assist Frankel in implementing the plan. Cardinal Re, as sostituto, was the third highest-ranking Vatican official at the time.

Jacobs discussed Frankels plan with his friend, Pio Cardinal Laghi, who was the head of the Congregation for Catholic Education in the Vatican, and who had previously served as the Vaticans Nuncio (Ambassador) to the United States. While Frankel was trying to gain approval for his plan, Laghi intervened at the Vatican on his behalf. Laghi also received $100,000 from Frankel in August 1998 as a donation to a hospital. When Laghi sent a thank-you letter to Frankel for the donation, it was returned to him by Jacobs, who told Laghi not to thank Frankel personally for the payment. Laghi then sent a new thank-you letter, which thanked only Frankels foundation for the funds.

Another Vatican official who knew of the plan was Father Giovanni DErcole, who is now one of the Capi Ufficio in the First Section of the Vaticans Secretariat of State. Frankel had considered using DErcoles religious order, the Sons of Divine Providence, also known as Don Orioneafter its founder, as the vehicle through which to channel funds to St. Francis. DErcole visited with Frankel at his home in Connecticut, and a charity operated by the Sons of Divine Providence received donations from Frankel.

Archbishop Alberto Tricarico (Tricarico) also knew about the plan. Tricarico was the Nunzio Apostolico a disposizione in the Second Section of the Vaticans Secretariat of State, where his responsibilities included overseeing the Holy Sees relations with the countries formerly comprising the Soviet Union. Tricarico knew that Frankel was the donorof St. Francis. Tricarico considered traveling to Connecticut to meet Frankel in person. He also, through Jacobs, sought to obtain money from Frankel for Catholic charities in Kazakhstan. Jacobs traveled to Almaty in Kazakhstan at Tricaricos request to visit some of the charities. Jacobsairplane ticket was charged to an American Express card controlled by Frankel and paid with looted funds.

Frankel was also interested in securing the involvement of the Istituto per le Opere diReligione (IOR), popularly known as the Vatican Bank.As a Vatican entity, the IOR is beyond the reach of any regulatory scrutiny other than the Vaticans own supervision. Although Colagiovanni informed Frankel that, as a non-Catholic, he could not open his own account at the IOR, Colagiovanni assured Frankel that any fund or donation given to MEF would fall under the protection of the very strict confidentiality and secrecy” laws that apply to any entity linked to the IOR.

The IOR was involved in a number of ways with Frankels scheme. MEF has an account at the IOR, and Colagiovanni and, apparently Jacobs, were both authorized users of that account. Frankel wired money to MEFs account at the IOR, as described below. Jacobs also had his own account at the IOR to which Frankel wired money.

In addition, as part of the scheme, Frankel had Colagiovanni obtain a letter from the IOR, indicating that MEF was an organization in good standing with the IOR. Before the IOR would issue the letter, Colagiovanni was required to, and did, provide the IOR with information about Frankel and the plan. Colagiovanni and Frankel provided the IOR with the private telephone number of Frankels Swiss banker, Jean-Marie Wery (Wery), a Managing Director of Banque SCS Alliance. The IOR contacted Wery to confirm that Frankel had the wealth necessary to make the proposed donation.

After the IOR checked Frankels bank reference, Salerno prepared a letter confirming MEFs uninterrupted relationwith IOR, which was signed by the IORs director, Dr. Lelio Scaletti, and by another IOR official, Dr. Anthony Chiminello. This letter was used to bolster MEFs and St. Franciscredibility with insurance regulators and others. For example, when lawyers and officials connected with one of the United States insurance companies Frankel targeted questioned the Vaticans connection to St. Francis, the IOR letter was presented as proof of the association.

Frankel then directed that the proposed purchase of CLICO [Colorado Life Insurance Company] move forward, with MEF allegedly providing funding through St. Francis, the new purchaser.

Colagiovanni was directly involved in assisting Frankel in his efforts to acquire insurance companies. Colagiovanni made a number of significant representations in the United States about the Vaticans relationship with St. Francis. He used his position as a member of the Curia to convince state government officials and insurance companies in the United States that St. Francis was connected with the Vatican through MEF, and that St. Francis was a Vatican-funded initiative.

On November 24, 1998, St. Francis filed a Form A application with the Colorado Department of Insurance (the Colorado Department) for the purchase of CLICO. The Form A application included false representations stating, among other things, that St. Francis was the source of funds for the CLICO acquisition and that St. Francis had received its money from MEF. The Form A application also intentionally concealed Frankels involvement in and control of St. Francis, and falsely represented that Jacobs controlled St. Francis as its sole Trustee, when Frankel had complete control of St. Francis.

At the time of the filing of the Form A application, Colagiovanni, as an agent of the Vatican, knew, or was subjectively aware of a strong possibility of illegal conduct and purposefully contrived to avoid learning, that statements in the Form A application about control of St. Francis and its source of funding were false.

On November 24, 1998, Colagiovanni signed an unsworn affidavitin which he stated: The funds that the MEF has contributed to St. Francis for the purchase of the common stock of CLICO Acquisition Corporation have come from funds of the Holy See that are dedicated to use for investment for charitable purposes.The affidavitwas signed Emilio Colagiovanni, President MEF.This affidavitwas distributed to several insurance companies which Frankel was seeking to acquire. Colagiovanni has admitted this affidavit was false.

On December 4, 1998, in response to the Form A application, the Colorado Department sent Jacobs twenty-three detailed questions about St. Francis and its source of funding. As a result of this further inquiry by the Colorado Department, by mid-December, Frankel and his associates withdrew the St. Francis Form A application and abandoned the proposed CLICO acquisition.

In December 1998, not long after St. Francis had submitted the Form A relating to CLICO, St. Francis signed a Letter of Intent to purchase Western United Life Assurance Company (Western United) of Spokane, Washington. In the course of negotiating the deal, representatives of St. Francis told Western United employees that Frankel, who was still posing as Rosse,did bond trading for the Vatican, that the source of funds for the Western United deal was the Vatican, that the purpose of the Vaticans proposed investment was to grow Vatican assets, and that the Pope himself had authorized funds to go to MEF from a general fund, which were then contributed to St. Francis. These statements were false.

Vatican leadership was informed on several occasions that persons acting on behalf of St. Francis and MEF were representing that St. Francis was connected with the Vatican, and making misrepresentations about St. Francisfunding and control. In January 1999, C. Paul Sandifur (Sandifur), the President of Western Uniteds parent company, sent a letter to Vatican Secretary of State Angelo Cardinal Sodano asking for a confirmation of statements about St. Francisand MEFs relationship to the Vatican. In particular, Sandifur asked Cardinal Sodano (a) whether St. Francis was an agent of the Holy See, (b) whether MEF was a Vatican foundation, (c) whether MEF was the settlor of St. Francis, and (d) whether the Holy See had given $190 million to MEF and St. Francis, as had been represented.

Re sent a reply on behalf of the Vatican, but stated only that, with respect to St. Francis, no such foundation has the approval of the Holy See or exists in the Vatican.Re did not deny that the Vatican had donated $190 million to MEF, that MEF had donated $190 million to St. Francis, or that MEF was a Vatican foundation. Res careful, cryptic and incomplete response to Sandifurs letter in February 1999 was in sharp contrast to the Vaticans response to similar questions posed by the international press in June 1999, after Frankels scheme was exposed to the world. It also differed from the more informative, but still incomplete, letter Re wrote to Cardinal OConnor of New York, dated the same day as his response to Sandifur.  Despite being informed through the Western United letter that statements were being made in the United States to insurance companies that the Vatican knew were false, neither Re nor any other Vatican official took steps to correct or stop the misrepresentations made by Colagiovanni, Frankel and others concerning St. Franciscontrol and funding. In fact, by giving an incomplete response to Sandifurs inquiries, Re created the impression that the statements he failed to address were true. Colagiovanni explained the letter by stating that, according to Vatican policy, failure to address certain facts in such a response indicates those facts are true.

On February 16, 1999, after Western United had received the letter from Re, and to mitigate the ambiguous nature of Res letter, representatives of St. Francis faxed to Western United a written statement signed by Colagiovanni in which he represented that MEF had contributed $1billion to St. Francis with funds that came from various Roman Catholic tribunals and Roman Catholic charitable and cultural institutions.This statement was later submitted to insurance regulators in an attempt to substantiate the Vaticans alleged funding of MEF and St. Francis. Colagiovanni knew that the representations made in the statement were false when he made them….

To further demonstrate St. Francisand MEFs ties to the Vatican, Frankel and Colagiovanni arranged for two Western United executives, Sandifur and William Snider (Snider), Chief Financial Officer of Western United, to travel to the Vatican and meet with Vatican officials to clarify whether representations made about the Vaticans involvement with St. Francis and MEF were true. Snider and Sandifur were accompanied by Father Eugene Tracy (Tracy), a former insurance executive now serving as a Roman Catholic priest in Spokane. Frankel had thus far failed to make the $5 million donationhe had promised to MEF. Apparently in the hope of encouraging Frankel to make the payment, Colagiovanni agreed to host the executives.

Sandifur, Snider and Tracy met with Colagiovanni in the Cancelleria, the building which houses the Rota. This building, although located in a section of Rome which is not contiguous to the main area of Vatican City, is considered the Vaticans sovereign territory. Swiss Guards, the personal guards of the Pope, were stationed outside.

While in an office in the Cancelleria, Colagiovanni told the Western United executives and Tracy that the funds MEF provided to St. Francis originated from friends of the foundation and that some of the money was actually secret Vatican funds. Sandifur, Snider and Tracy then met with an Italian bishop believed to be Salerno, who by that time had become the Secretary of the Supremo Tribunale della Segnatura Apostolica, another of the Vaticans courts with offices in the Cancelleria. The bishop posed for a picture with them.

The Western United visitors were given a tour of the Vatican by Colagiovanni, including several areas not usually accessible to tourists. The Western United executives reasonably concluded from their visit that MEF and St. Francis were known in the Vatican, that Colagiovanni was who he claimed to be, and that MEF and St. Francis were recipients of Vatican money.

The Western United visitors also met with Alan Kershaw, an American lawyer who argues cases before the Vaticans tribunals and who represents the Vaticans own interests from time to time. Kershaw, apparently at Colagiovannis request, assured the Western United visitors that a group of northern Italian laypeoplewho wanted to obtain the tax benefits available by a donation to the Vatican had secretly donated large sums of money to MEF. Like Colagiovanni, Kershaw also indicated that MEF had received funds from the Vatican. To further assure the Western United visitors about the proposed deal, Kershaw told them that the Vatican exercised supervisory power over St. Francis and that St. Francisfunds and money management would go through the IOR.

Meanwhile, Frankel, Bolan and Colagiovanni had been upset with Res letter sent to Sandifur, because it did not, in their view, affirmatively support the representations being made about MEF and St. Francis. To ensure that this would not happen again, Colagiovanni arranged for Bolan to meet with Vatican officials in March 1999 to discuss how the Vatican should answer future inquiries related to St. Francisacquisition of United States insurance companies. Colagiovanni originally arranged for Bolan to meet with Re, but Bolan and Colagiovanni in fact met with Agostino Cardinal Cacciavillan (Cacciavillan), the president of the Administration of the Property of the Holy See. At this time, Cacciavillan was the government official in charge of the Vaticans investments, although he had recently left his post as the Vaticans Nuncio (Ambassador) to the United States.

Sandifurs letter and Res response were specifically discussed at this meeting. Cacciavillan was informed that a private individual, and not MEF or the Vatican, was the source of St. Francisfunds, and he knew that MEF would be used as a vehicle through which this private individual would make donationsto St. Francis. Despite this knowledge, Cacciavillan did not tell Bolan or Colagiovanni to stop claiming that the funds originated with MEF or the Vatican. Cacciavillan directed only that St. Francis not be held out as a Vatican foundation, and did not express any concern about any other aspects of the described relationship between St. Francis and MEF or between MEF and the Vatican.

Instead, Cacciavillan, Colagiovanni and Bolan agreed that if the Vatican received any future inquiries related to St. Francispurchase of United States insurance companies, the inquiries would be routed to Colagiovanni or someone else who understood the MEF/St. Francis plan, who could then respond….

[In addition to the $100,000 which Pio Cardinal Laghi received] Colagiovanni, and, indirectly, the Vatican, received benefits from Colagiovannis role in Frankels scheme.

From August 1998 to May 1999, Frankel made periodic financial contributions to Colagiovanni, Jacobs and MEF, and to accounts designated by them. The following represent some, but not all, of the wire transfers:

On December 11, 1998, Frankel wired $10,000 from his Swiss account to Jacobs’ account at Chase Manhattan Bank in New York for further credit to MEFs account at the IOR.

On February 24, 1999, Frankel caused $10,000 to be wired from the account of “Rosseat Chase Manhattan Bank in New York to MEFs account at the IOR.

On April 20, 1999, Frankel wired $40,000 to Jacobsaccount at the IOR for the benefit of Rosse/St. Francis.

On April 22, 1999, Frankel wired $30,000 to Jacobsaccount at Chase Manhattan Bank in New York. Jacobs wrote a check to Colagiovanni for $20,000 which Colagiovanni then deposited at the IOR….

Thomas A. Bolan received three payments totalling $175,156.89

Don Orione Fathers received two payments of $49,105.35

Father Peter Jacobs received sixteen payments totalling $245,421.09….

[In March 1999, the Mississippi insurance department began investigating Frankel and called a hearing in April.] On April 27, 1999, Colagiovanni traveled from Rome to Mississippi at Frankels expense. Frankel, Colagiovanni and others associated with St. Francis visited the Bishop of Jacksons official residence on April 27, 1999, in hopes of convincing the bishop to attend the hearing at the Mississippi Department. He declined to do so….

By mid-May 1999, Frankels financial fraud had been uncovered by state insurance regulators and federal and state law enforcement officials and was made public. On June 30, 1999, the Vatican, through its Press Office Director, for the first time contended publicly that the Vatican had no legal or financial connection to MEF or St. Francis:

“I wish to make it clear that the Monitor Ecclesiasticus and St. Francis of Assisi Foundations do not have Vatican juridical character and are not inscribed in the registers of Vatican juridical personalities. I wish to add that the Holy See does not have any relationship with Father Peter Jacobs and has neither furnished nor

received funds from either the Monitor Ecclesiasticus Foundation or the St. Francis of Assisi Foundation. Contrary to what has been affirmed, the St. Francis of Assisi Foundation does not have an account in the Institute for Works of Religion (IOR) and indeed is not recognized by this Institute. Msgr. Emilio Colagiovanni is president of the Monitor Ecclesiasticus Foundation, established by the archdiocese of Naples in 1967. This foundation has always acted totally outside of any Vatican context, and does not have any relationship with it whatsoever.”….

[The section “CLAIMS AGAINST COLAGIOVANNI, MEF AND THE VATICAN Violations of 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) All Plaintiffs v. Colagiovanni, MEF and the Vatican“, notes:]

The Vatican was associated with the enterprises through the actions of its agent Colagiovanni. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Colagiovanni acted as the agent of the Vatican. Through its agent Colagiovanni and other agents, the Vatican knew that funds represented as being held by St. Francis and contributed to St. Francis by MEF, were not held by St. Francis and had not been contributed to MEF. It knew, through its agent Colagiovanni, that funds allegedly contributed to MEF by the Vatican or Vatican-related entities for further contribution to St. Francis had not been contributed. It knew, through Colagiovanni, that Frankel was to be the source of any funds allegedly contributed to either foundation. It knew, through Colagiovanni, that Frankel controlled St. Francis, even though Jacobs, Bolan and Collins were listed as members of the Board of Trustees. Colagiovannis position within the Vatican was an essential element of the scheme because it gave a patina of legitimacy to St. Francis, and Colagiovanni used his position in furtherance of the scheme. High-ranking officials at the Vatican authorized or ratified the plan whereby MEF would be used as a conduit for the flow of Frankel=s money to St. Francis to purchase U.S. insurance companies, while St. Francis claimed a Vatican tie.

Colagiovanni had actual authority to act as the Vaticans agent in connection with Frankels scheme by virtue of his position as a member of the Curia, as a prelate auditor emeritus, and as a consultant to two Vatican Congregations. Further, high-ranking officials with the power to bind the Vatican in financial matters were aware of, did not object to, and explicitly or tacitly approved Frankels plan and Colagiovannis and MEFs role in the plan in advance of its implementation, including that part of the plan that would require representations to be made that Frankels foundation had Vatican connections. Colagiovanni consulted with high-ranking Vatican officials about the plan, and obtained their approval. Because of the involvement of these highranking officials, Colagiovanni had the Vaticans actual authority to assist Frankel in his scheme, and Colagiovannis representations about the Vatican connection and funding were made within the scope of that authority. As Colagiovannis principal, the Vatican is responsible Colagiovannis acts committed within the scope of his agency.

In addition, Colagiovanni had apparent authority to bind the Vatican by virtue of his positions within the Vatican. He had access to private areas of the Vatican and brought insurance company executives there to convince them of the Vaticans involvement in the MEF/St. Francis plan. He used Vatican faxes, letterhead and telephone lines, including the letterhead of the Rota and the fax cover sheet of Vatican City,to participate in the plan. He was able to secure for lay people

audiences with Vatican officials, in their offices on Vatican sovereign territory, and was able to have members of the Curia pose for pictures with visiting insurance company executives. While in Mississippi, Colagiovanni wore clerical clothing and a purported Papal ring, and expressly held himself out to Mississippi regulators as an emissary of the Vatican.

The Vatican manifested this authority to third parties by allowing Colagiovanni to use the Vaticans office buildings to meet with third parties, by participating in these meetings, by allowing Colagiovanni to use its fax and telephone lines to contact third persons, and by allowing Colagiovanni to use its letterhead to communicate with third persons. The Vatican also manifested its approval of Colagiovannis and MEFs role in the scheme by its silence when questioned about them, which connoted approval under the circumstances.

Colagiovannis actions were also ratified by the Vatican. High-ranking Vatican officials including Re and Cacciavillan knew of, and failed to repudiate, certain of Colagiovannis misrepresentations, when presented with the opportunity to do so. This refusal to repudiate or comment was in complete contrast to the Vaticans efforts to distance itself from Colagiovanni, MEF and St. Francis in June 1999, after the Frankel scandal drew the attention of the international media. Both Re and Cacciavillan, among others, had the clear chance to end Colagiovannis participation in the scheme and to prevent further misrepresentations about the claimed Vatican link. Neither took the steps to do so.

When presented with Sandifurs pointed inquiries about MEFs and St. Francisfunding clearly premised on misrepresentations, Re did not deny that the Vatican had given $190 million to MEF for St. Francis, a fact which Re knew was false, nor did he act to correct or even address several of the other issues presented in the Sandifur letter. His silence gave the impression that St. Francismisrepresentations about its funding were correct and enabled the scheme to continue.

When Cacciavillan was presented with evidence of Colagiovannis involvement in Frankels plan, including the claims that the Vatican had given $190 million to MEF, instead of repudiating the claims to the target of the misrepresentations and directing Colagiovanni to cease making such claims as an agent of the Vatican, Cacciavillan agreed to forward to Colagiovanni or someone else more familiar with the scheme any future inquiries about MEF, St. Francis or about the Vaticans connection to either, thereby enabling the plan to continue.

At all times relevant to this complaint, the activities of the Vatican and its agents were wholly commercial and secular. Its actions were not uniquely sovereign in nature, nor were they of a religious character. Its actions and motivations, and those of its agents, were of the same type as any private commercial entity interested in investing in U.S. insurance companies for profit.

In 1998 and 1999, Colagiovanni, MEF and the Vatican knowingly conducted, participated in, controlled, manipulated, or directed the enterprisesaffairs through a pattern of racketeering activity consisting of violations of the federal mail and wire fraud statutes, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(c).

Specifically, Colagiovanni, MEF and the Vatican implemented Frankels scheme to defraud by assisting Frankel in the establishment of St. Francis for the purpose of acquiring insurance companies while concealing the true source of St. Francisfunding, and concealing Frankels control of and involvement in St. Francis, and by causing false statements to be made to insurance regulators and others to conceal St. Francistrue source of funding and Frankels control and involvement in the proposed acquisition of those insurance companies, and to conceal and maintain Frankels control of the Insurance Companies and their assets…..”

—–

Frankel fled to Germany to escape being arrested. In 2000, Frankel was sentenced to three years in a German prison for failing to pay custom taxes on smuggled diamonds and carrying falsified passports. After being extradited back to the US, Frankel pleaded guilty to charges in both Mississippi state court and federal court. In December 2004, Frankel was sentenced in federal court to nearly 17 years in prison.
  
Colagiovanni pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to deceive state insurance regulators in Mississippi state court. The attorney general’s office recommended a suspended sentence because of the priest’s cooperation in the office’s attempt to recover stolen insurance funds. In September 2002 the court gave Colagiovanni a suspended prison sentence and five year’s probation. In September 2004, a federal judge fined Colagiovanni $15,000 and when his visa expired, Colagiovanni wasn’t to be allowed back in the US “even to attend the funerals of his sister and other family members who have stood by him throughout his prosecution and shame.”
  
Father Peter Jacobs pleaded guilty in federal court in October 2004 to signing documents he knew to be false. I could not find what penalty, if anyt, he was given but according to Fr. Jacobs’ 2008 death notice in the New York Times: “In 2005, a party held to honor his 50th anniversary as a priest and his 80th birthday was attended by many of his longtime associates, including Dr. Alan Kessler, Mr. Walter Cronkite, Mr. Edgar Bronfman Jr. and Yoko Ono.”   
 
Thomas Bolan was a fundraiser for the Republican Party. A Knight of Malta, Bolan’s law firm represented  Michele Sindona, a Sicilian banker responsible for the collapse of Long Island’s Franklin National Bank and tied to the great Vatican Bank scandal of the early 1980s. In May 2005. Bolan was fined $10,000 for helping Frankel conceal his crimes and, with “grounds for leniency based on Bolan’s multiple health problems and ‘incredible military service,'” was given a year’s probation.  
 

As far as the 2002 lawsuit is concerned, the Vatican has used its usual tactics to delay and obfuscate. The last I could find on the matter was a January 2008 response to another bogus objection the Vatican had raised. Given that none of the five commissioners currently hold the same office, and that at some point the $600,000 they had hoped to obtain would be exceeded in legal and court fees, the case may never be adjudicated. We shall see.
 
(Betty Clermont is author of The Neo-Catholics – Implementing Christian Nationalism in America.)

The service they have performed for the Catholic laity, however, is inestimable. This is the clearest insight into Vatican finances we have yet been privy to and we shall probably never have another.

 
 

 

Advertisements

6 Responses

  1. Wow! Brilliant post, Betty, thanks so much. Redefines the terms ‘devious’, ‘duplicitous’ and ‘convoluted’ and brings them down to a new low.

  2. How can anybody think for one second our current crop of curial leaders give a damn about anyone’s soul?—- Maybe if you have enough money they might pretend to care about your soul.

    Why am I not surprised that once again the names Sodano and Re are implicated in bribe taking. Thanks for this piece Betty. It deserves a wide audience.

  3. Thanks very much, Jayden and Colleen, for your kind remarks. They’re the stuff that keeps me going. Betty

  4. To paraphrase a wonderful movie:

    Cardinal Renault: I’m shocked, shocked to find that embezzlement is going on in here!
    [a banker hands Cardinal Renault a pile of money]
    banker: Your tithe, your grace.
    Cardinal Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.

  5. Casablanca! haha. simply shocked!

  6. […] we’re on the subject of the Vatican bank and money laundering, those of you who read my article “What is the Vatican REALLY Like?” may remember the name of Fr. Brian Farrell as one of […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: