My biggest fear is that he will try to out evangelize the evangelicals, using their own rhetoric and mind set, with the same theocratic goals in mind. If that happens, well, I’ll once again be energized and out will come the sword.

As for men such as Tom Woods, whom you attempt to slander in your article. You could only wish to aspire to the scholastic excellence they represent. While you may not agree with their premise, which is your right, you do yourself a disservice by not attempting to match argument for argument. While he does appear to ascribe to the principles of Austrian economics, it is a logical fallacy to assume that he agrees with all the ideas presented in Murray Rothbard or Ludwig von Mises’ works. Do discover his opinions you would have to either ask him yourself or read his woks in depth. To do otherwise is a sign of intellectual dishonesty.

It is apparent in the way you describe the subjects of your article that you are not, in fact, interested in an honest debate. Instead, you would prefer to put up straw men, placed under banners such as neo-confederate, which you can then tear down in the name of “tolerance”. This form of “tolerance” is unique in that it is only willing to accept those positions which it agrees with and finds all others intolerable.

I have a bibliography of his writing at: http://www.templeofdemocracy.com/ThomasEWoods.htm

He also wrote for the “Southern Patriot,” official publication of the League of the South.

He had an article in the “United Daughters of the Confederacy Magazine,” and articles in “Chronicles” magazine.

Thomas Woods isn’t merely ultraright. He represents a pre-Modern form of reactionary thinking that is prior to the Enlightenment.

I also direct you to this article.

http://www.templeofdemocracy.com/ConfederateChristianNationalism.pdf

The article is more focused on the Calvinist side of Confederate Christianity.

There is an Anglican & Roman Catholic Confederate Christian movement also.